USPTO serial 73349690
NATIONAL PRODUCTIVITY REVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1260462Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 6, 1983
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NATIONAL PRODUCTIVITY REVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Journal-Devoted to Literature Relating to Productivity Management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 3, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Executive Enterprises Publications Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by EXECUTIVE ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Executive Enterprises Publications Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named NATIONAL PRODUCTIVITY REVIEW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2004 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 14, 1990 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 15, 1990 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Mar 20, 1990 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Dec 6, 1989 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1983 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 6, 1983 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 22, 1983 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 1983 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1983 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1983 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 1983 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |