Drawing for LOOKING GOOD

USPTO serial 73351696

LOOKING GOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOOKING GOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norman P. Soloway

NORMAN P SOLOWAY HAYES SOLOWAY PC3450 E SUNRISE DR STE 140TUCSON, AZ 85718UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PRINTED MATTER-NAMELY, LOOSE-LEAF BINDERINDEX CARDS PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THEFIELD OF HEALTH AND BEAUTY, MORE PARTICULARLY SKIN CARE, MAKEUP, HAIR CARE AND HAIR STYLES, DIET, EXERCISE AND CLOTHING,AND PERIODIC NEWSLETTERS WITH RESPECT TOTHE FOREGOINGABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 27, 1984ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Nov 13, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 6, 1984CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 17, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 7, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 12, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 1, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 20, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 19, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 16, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 15, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 3, 1983ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 28, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 23, 1982CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 1982DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 10, 1982DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance