USPTO serial 73353244
LUBEMASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1454879Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 1, 1987
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LUBEMASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS, OH
WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS, OH
WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS, OH
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas B. Farrow
Douglas B. Farrow Graco Inc.P.O. Box 1441Minneapolis, MN 55440-1441UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | AUTOMATIC LUBRICATING PUMP SYSTEMS FOR LUBRICATING BEARINGS OF PRESSES, BANBURY MIXERS, RUBBER MILLS, UPSETTERS, HEADING MACHINES, CRANE TROLLEYS AND MACHINERY TOOLS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 8, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GRACO MINNESOTA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LUBRIQUIP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LUBRIQUIP - HOUDAILLE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LUBRIQUIP - HOUDAILLE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HOUDAILLE INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GRACO MINNESOTA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GRACO MINNESOTA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LUBRIQUIP - HOUDAILLE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named LUBEMASTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 31, 1993 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 21, 1992 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 9, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 21, 1986 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1985 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 13, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1984 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 10, 1984 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1983 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |