USPTO serial 73354385
STA-KURL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1375273Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 10, 1985
- Examiner
- WISEMAN, MICHELLE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STA-KURL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PEPPER PIKE, OH
CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OH
DIAGNOSTIC HAIR AND SKIN SALON
Pepper Pike, OH
DIAGNOSTIC HAIR AND SKIN SALON
CLEVELAND, OH
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | NON-AEROSOL SPRAY HAIR CONDITONER | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INNOVATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ALLEN, HERMAN L.
- Other trademarks owned by DIAGNOSTIC HAIR AND SKIN SALON
- Other trademarks owned by DIAGNOSTIC HAIR AND SKIN SALON
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named STA-KURL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2009 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 30, 1992 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 30, 1992 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Dec 4, 1991 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1985 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 2, 1985 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |