USPTO serial 73354837
CROWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CROWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | MURIATIC ACID, TRISODIUM PHOSPHATE, JOINT CEMENT (POWDER), OXALIC ACID (WOODBLEACH), WALLPAPER REMOVER | ABANDONED | Jul 8, 1978 |
| 003 | HAND CLEANER | ABANDONED | Aug 10, 1981 |
| 004 | KEROSENE | ABANDONED | Jul 10, 1979 |
| 019 | WALL WASH; PLASTER OF PARIS; SLOW SET PATCHING PLASTER; WOOD FIBER PLA STER; WOOD PUTTY; PUMICE; ROTTENSTONE; WATER PUTTY (CRACK-FILLER); TIL E GROUT; SPACKLING POWDER; OXALIC ACID (WOOD BLEACH) | ABANDONED | Aug 3, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 1985 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 12, 1985 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 13, 1985 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 8, 1984 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1984 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 9, 1984 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 9, 1984 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 19, 1984 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 31, 1983 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |