USPTO serial 73355359
OPEN SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1588259Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 20, 1990
- Examiner
- MARKS, MARTIN H.
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OPEN SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Shakopee, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly T. Eichten
Molly T. Eichten Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd.8300 Norman Center DriveSuite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55437-1060Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Designing of Computer Software with Applications in the Accounting Field | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Open Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Open Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by OPEN SYSTEMS HOLDINGS CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by Open Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OPEN SYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 18, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 10, 2000 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | PRA9 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 9 | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | PRA9 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 9 | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | 9.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 FILED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Jul 13, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 20, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 1989 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 16, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 1984 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 1984 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 3, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 1984 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 23, 1984 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 23, 1984 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 23, 1984 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 23, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1983 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |