USPTO serial 73356148
PRO TEC ANTI-FRICTION LABORATORY PROVEN METAL TREATMENT SAVES GAS AND MAINTENANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 11, 1984
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRO TEC ANTI-FRICTION LABORATORY PROVEN METAL TREATMENT SAVES GAS AND MAINTENANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Faye R. Longo
FAYE R LONGO MARKETING CONSULTANTS OF AMERICA CORP5475 CRESTVIEWMEMPHIS, TN 38134UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | a Gasoline Additive for Lubricating and Coating the Interior of Automotive Engines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 13, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hester; Charles R.
- Other trademarks owned by Hester; Charles R.
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named PRO TEC ANTI-FRICTION LABORATORY PROVEN METAL TREATMENT SAVES GAS AND MAINTENANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 1991 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 11, 1984 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 14, 1984 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1984 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1984 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 1983 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |