USPTO serial 73361489
JAN JANSEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JAN JANSEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith E. Danish
KEITH E DANISH GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN & MCCARTHY36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Belts, Boots, Shoes, and Slippers | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1963 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1986 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 19, 1986 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 1986 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 1, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 25, 1984 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 1984 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 1984 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 1984 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 1984 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 1984 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 18, 1984 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 1984 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 1, 1984 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 1983 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |