USPTO serial 73361869
UNISCENT BY ERTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1620713Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 6, 1990
- Examiner
- WISEMAN, MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with UNISCENT BY ERTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELOISE L. MORGAN
ELOISE L MORGAN WINTHROP, STIMSON, PUTNAM & ROBERTSONE BATTERY PARK PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | TOILETRIES, COSMETICS AND HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY SHAMPOOS, TOILET SOAPS, PERFUMES AND AROMATIC ESSENCES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2001 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 26, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jul 3, 1996 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 14, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 12, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |