USPTO serial 73362227
CLASSIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINGERET, DONALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLASSIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MANNY D. POKOTILOW
MANNY D POKOTILOW CAESAR RIVISE BERNSTEIN & COHEN, LTDSTE 800 STEPHEN GIRARD BLDG21 S 12TH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19107Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | PREMIUM BEER | ABANDONED | Apr 15, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 13, 1986 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 13, 1986 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 8, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 13, 1985 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 1985 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 1985 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 13, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1984 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |