USPTO serial 73363566
SIMPLY SCRUMPTIOUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 18, 1986
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SIMPLY SCRUMPTIOUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WALTHAM, MA
PEWTER POT MUFFIN COMPANY, INC.
WALTHAM, MA
WALTHAM, MA
WALTHAM, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIMOTHY H. HIEBERT
PAUL J PERRY LOSCOCCO RIEMER & BRAUNSTEIN LLPTHREE CTR PLZBOSTON, MA 02108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | PASTRIES, NAMELY - COOKIES, CAKES, DONUTS AND MUFFINS; AND SANDWICHES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SERVICE SUPPLY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by PEWTER POT MUFFIN COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SERVICE SUPPLY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SERVICE SUPPLY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SIMPLY SCRUMPTIOUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 1992 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 25, 1992 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1986 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 24, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |