USPTO serial 73365930
EYE MASTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 22, 1984
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EYE MASTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WILMINGTON, DE
SAN ANTONIO, TX
Baton Rouge, LA
Baton Rouge, LA
Baton Rouge, LA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAMELA B. HUFF
PAMELA B HUFF COX & SMITH INCORPORATED112 E PECAN ST STE 1800SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205-1521UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Optical Services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 11, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ECCA ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VISIONWORKS ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EYE CARE CENTER OF AMERICA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Cutrer; John N.
- Other trademarks owned by Cutrer; John N.
- Other trademarks owned by Cutrer; John N.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EYE MASTERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 16, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 11, 2004 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 11, 2004 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2004 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1990 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 8, 1990 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 22, 1984 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 28, 1984 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 18, 1984 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 1983 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |