USPTO serial 73367136
MEET ME AT THE DERBY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEET ME AT THE DERBY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KIT M. STETINA, BRUCE B. BRUNDA ET AL
KIT M STETINA STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESTAURANT AND HOTEL SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 29, 1991 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 1987 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 28, 1984 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 29, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |