Drawing for THE OLD FORT

USPTO serial 73368483

THE OLD FORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE OLD FORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Malcolm A. Litman

MALCOLM A LITMAN LITMAN, DAY AND MCMAHON1215 COMMERCE BANK BLDGKANSAS CITY, MO 64106UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Laundry Bleach, All-Purpose Foaming Cleaner, All-Purpose Liquid Abrasive Cleaner, Mineral Oil Solution for Use as Dust Mop Treatment, Furniture Polish, Liquid Glass Cleaner, and Floor Finish Solution which Forms a High Gloss Acrylic Coating When Applied to a FloorABANDONEDMay 27, 1981
005Room Deodorant and Surface DisinfectantABANDONEDMay 27, 1981
016Legal Pads, Freezer Paper, Memo Paper Duplicator Paper, Bathroom Tissue, Folded Paper Towels, Roll Towels, Facial Tissue and Butcher's Roll WrapABANDONEDMay 27, 1981

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 1986ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 12, 1986OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 21, 1986OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 23, 1984OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 24, 1984PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 9, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 8, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 7, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 6, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 13, 1983CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance