USPTO serial 73369639
NRF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NRF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HAROLD TRAUB
STE 97682 WORLD TRADE CTRNEW YORK, NY 10048Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | RADIATORS, RADIATOR CORES, INTER COOLERS AND HEAT EXCHANGERS, ALL BEING PARTS OF MACHINES; AND RADIATORS AND RADIATOR CORES, BEING PARTS OF WATER VEHICLES | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | RADIATORS, RADIATOR CORES, INTERCOOLERS,AND HEAT EXCHANGERS FOR GENERAL INDUSTRIAL USE | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | RADIATORS AND RADIATOR CORES, BEING PARTS OF LAND VEHICLES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1985 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 27, 1984 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 17, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |