USPTO serial 73369955
SECUREX X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 30, 1985
- Examiner
- MOSKOWITZ SIDNEY I
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SECUREX X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Securex Business Machines, Inc.
Elk Grove Village, IL
Securex Business Machines, Inc.
Elk Grove Village, IL
Securex Business Machines, Inc.
Elk Grove Village, IL
MICHAEL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
NORTH CHARLESTON, SC
Other trademarks owned by MICHAEL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE S. LAWRENCE
LAWRENCE S LAWRENCE LAWRENCE & WALSH PC215 HILTON AVEHAMPSTEAD, NY 11551UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Office Machines and Equipment-Namely, Paper Shredders, Collators and Joggers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Securex Business Machines, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Securex Business Machines, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Securex Business Machines, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MICHAEL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named SECUREX X
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2016 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 1991 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 3, 1991 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Sep 23, 1991 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Apr 26, 1991 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1985 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 12, 1984 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 1984 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 1984 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 1984 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 1984 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 1983 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |