USPTO serial 73370017
SATCOM TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 12, 1985
- Examiner
- โ
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SATCOM TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger P. Furey, Esq., Rebecca E. McDougall, Esq.
ROGER P FUREY ESQ REBECCA E MCDOUGA KATTEN MUCHEN ROSENMAN LLP1025 THOMAS JEFFERESON ST NW STEWASHINGTON, DC 20007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Antenna Reflectors for Use in Earth Stations Forming a Portion of a Satellite Communications Systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 6, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Radiation Systems Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Radiation Systems Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Radiation Systems Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SATCOM TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2006 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | โ |
| Jan 11, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | โ |
| Jul 24, 1991 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | โ |
| Mar 21, 1991 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | โ |
| Nov 12, 1985 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register โ the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ยฎ symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 24, 1985 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | โ |
| Jun 17, 1985 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | โ |
| Jan 24, 1984 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | โ |
| Sep 6, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | โ |
| Aug 10, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | โ |
| Jun 28, 1983 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | โ |
| May 26, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| May 18, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| May 6, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Apr 22, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |