USPTO serial 73370220
TADEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TADEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
IAN JAY KAUFMAN
IAN JAY KAUFMAN NEW YORKC/O LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST ST LINCOLN CTR, NY 10023Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELEPHONE EXCHANGES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1983 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |