USPTO serial 73370853
SACHA LONDON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 15, 1988
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SACHA LONDON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ALLWEAR TRADING COMPANY LIMITED, THE
LONDON, GB
Other trademarks owned by ALLWEAR TRADING COMPANY LIMITED, THE
LONDON, GB
LONDON, GB
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. CABELL BUSICK
G CABELL BUSICK POPHAM HAIK SCHNOBRICH & KAUFMAN655 15TH ST N WSTE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005-5701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | LADIES SHOES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 11, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALLWEAR TRADING COMPANY LIMITED, THE
- Other trademarks owned by TRANSATLANTIC SHOE CO. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by TRANSATLANTIC SHOE CO. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SACHA HOLDING CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by SACHA HOLDING CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SACHA LONDON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 1995 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 17, 1995 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jul 14, 1994 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 28, 1994 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 21, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 22, 1986 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 1984 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 12, 1984 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 14, 1984 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 13, 1983 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 24, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |