USPTO serial 73371411
VAC-U-MATIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VAC-U-MATIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew R. Basile
ANDREW R BASILESTE 555900 TWR DRTROY, MI 48098Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Machinery-Namely, Automatic Machines for Potting, Encapsulating and Metering Articles Under a Controlled Vacuum | ABANDONED | Aug 7, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 1985 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 1985 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 1985 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 1985 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 26, 1984 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 1984 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 29, 1984 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 1983 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |