USPTO serial 73371454
EDU-CON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EDU-CON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alvin M. Esterlitz
ALVIN M ESTERLITZ INDEPENDENCE MALL WROHM AND HAAS COMPANYPHILADELPHIA, PA 19105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational Services-Namely, Conducting Continuing Educational Programs for Health Care Professionals | ABANDONED | Apr 22, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 1984 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 12, 1984 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 1984 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 1984 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 1984 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 1983 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |