Drawing for DURAFLAME

USPTO serial 73372032

DURAFLAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1282956Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 26, 1984
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE DESTROYED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DURAFLAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Synthetic Fuel LogsSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJun 26, 1982

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 1986C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Nov 2, 1985XXXXPOST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION—
Oct 7, 1985PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7—
Sep 7, 1984C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Sep 7, 1984C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jun 26, 1984R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 3, 1984PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 16, 1984NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 1984CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 1983PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 14, 1983ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 28, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 1983PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance