Drawing for KAT'S MEOW

USPTO serial 73372051

KAT'S MEOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
MACK, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KAT'S MEOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin W. Johnson

MARTIN W JOHNSONSTE 700235 MONTGOMERY STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Combs, and Hair BrushesABANDONEDJan 4, 1982
026Barrettes, Ponytail Holders, Hair Clips, Hair Bands, and Hair PinsABANDONEDJun 28, 1982

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 1988ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISIONโ€”
Aug 4, 1988OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999โ€”
Jul 18, 1988OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999โ€”
Aug 28, 1986OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999โ€”
Aug 13, 1986OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999โ€”
Oct 9, 1984OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999โ€”
May 29, 1984PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 1984NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Feb 27, 1984CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Jan 26, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jan 26, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Aug 26, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Mar 10, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance