Drawing for ACCUDRIVE

USPTO serial 73372170

ACCUDRIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ACCUDRIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James R. Haller

JAMES R HALLER FREDRIKSON, BYRON, COLBORN, BISBEE& HANSEN, PA 4744 IDS CTRMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Digital Motor Speed ControllersABANDONEDFeb 1, 1981

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 1984OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 20, 1984ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 3, 1984OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jul 19, 1984OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 21, 1984PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 13, 1984NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 9, 1984NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 18, 1983CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance