Drawing for IFPS/OPTIMUM

USPTO serial 73372240

IFPS/OPTIMUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARKS, MARTIN H.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IFPS/OPTIMUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

B. Edward Shlesinger, Jr.

B EDWARD SHLESINGER JR SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT, GARVEY & DINSMORE2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Leasing of Computer Software to OthersABANDONEDApr 28, 1982

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 1985OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 8, 1985OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 8, 1985ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 28, 1984OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 28, 1984OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 28, 1984OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 28, 1984OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 2, 1984OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 11, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 11, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 26, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 20, 1983CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 1982DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance