Drawing for MARKETPLACE

USPTO serial 73375796

MARKETPLACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OMELKO, NANCY LOU
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARKETPLACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

L. PAUL BURD

L PAUL BURD BURD, BARTZ & GUTENKAUF1300 FOSHAY TWRMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042RETAIL STORE SERVICES, FEATURING HOUSEWARES, TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC OFFERED IN APPLICANT'S DEPARTMENT STORESABANDONEDMay 1, 1982

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 1987ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 22, 1986PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 22, 1986PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 1986NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 6, 1985CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 23, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 1984JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 16, 1984EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 1, 1984REINREINSTATED—
Feb 22, 1984ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 1984ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 16, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 1983CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 8, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance