USPTO serial 73375920
EPO TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EPO TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Adhesives and Coatings for the Restoration and Preservation of Concrete and Other Structures | ABANDONED | Apr 23, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 1986 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 1986 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 9, 1986 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 1984 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 1983 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |