USPTO serial 73376196
IN THE ENGLISH MANNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 21, 1985
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IN THE ENGLISH MANNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LANCYCH, BONCATH, PEMBROKESHIRE, GB
Lancych Boncath Dyfed Wales, GB
Lancych Boncath Dyfed Wales, GB
Lancych Boncath Dyfed Wales, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD L. BARTELS
DONALD L BARTELS COULDERT BROTHERS LLPONE MARKETSPEAR TWR STE 2100SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Travel Reservations Services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 27, 1978 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IN THE ENGLISH MANNER
- Other trademarks owned by In The English Manner
- Other trademarks owned by In The English Manner
- Other trademarks owned by In The English Manner
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named IN THE ENGLISH MANNER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 1992 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 13, 1992 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Oct 4, 1991 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| May 15, 1991 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 21, 1985 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 12, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 1984 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 31, 1984 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1983 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 25, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |