Drawing for COMPUTER SENTRY

USPTO serial 73377024

COMPUTER SENTRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with COMPUTER SENTRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arthur A. Jacobs

ARTHUR A JACOBS TRACHTMAN, JACOBS & BECKBROAD AND CHESTNUT STS726 LAND TITLE BLDGPHILADELPHIA, PA 19110

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009a Telephone Screening Terminal Used to Restrict Access to Computer Facilities to Users Furnishing an Appropriate Code NumberABANDONEDJun 4, 1982

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 1986ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 29, 1986OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 12, 1985OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 6, 1984OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 1, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 20, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 19, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 16, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 15, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 8, 1983CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 5, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance