USPTO serial 73379027
AURUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AURUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAO PAULO, SP., BR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | OFFICE FURNITURE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |