USPTO serial 73380399
OPTIMUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 25, 1986
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with OPTIMUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DENVER, CO
DENVER, CO
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Jefferson, CO
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian E. Bates
Brian E. Bates Antonio Bates Bernard, P.C.3200 Cherry Creek South Drive, Suite 380DENVER, CO 80209UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UVEON COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by UVEON COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by REMANCO SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BERG ENGINEERING CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by REMANCO SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named OPTIMUM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 30, 2017 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1997 | CCON | COUNTERCLAIM OPP. NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 1994 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Jun 10, 1994 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1994 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 22, 1992 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1986 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 30, 1986 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 1986 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 29, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1983 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 22, 1983 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |