USPTO serial 73380401
OPTIMUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1413086Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 14, 1986
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OPTIMUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DENVER, CO
DENVER, CO
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN E. BATES
BRIAN E BATES ANTONIO BATES BERNARD HAENEL3200 CHERRY CREEK S DR STE 380DENVER, CO 80209UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UVEON COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by UVEON COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by REMANCO SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by REMANCO SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BERG ENGINEERING CO., INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named OPTIMUM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2017 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 1997 | CCON | COUNTERCLAIM OPP. NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 1994 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Jun 10, 1994 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1992 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 22, 1992 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1986 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 30, 1986 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 1986 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 16, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 1985 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1984 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 1983 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |