USPTO serial 73381938
CRESCOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRESCOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William C. Babcock
WILLIAM C BABCOCKSTE 712100 E OCEAN BLVDLONG BEACH, CA 90802Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Filters for Laboratory and Clinical Research Use | ABANDONED | Jan 3, 1971 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 1986 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 10, 1986 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 7, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 1984 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 1984 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 1984 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1984 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 4, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1984 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 1984 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 1983 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |