USPTO serial 73382532
G.D. RITZY'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1588055Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 20, 1990
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with G.D. RITZY'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
COLUMBUS, OH
Fort Worth, TX
COLUMBUS, OH
G.D.R. FRANCHISEE ASSOCIATION, INC.
COLUMBUS, OH
Other trademarks owned by G.D.R. FRANCHISEE ASSOCIATION, INC.
COLUMBUS, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott L. Harper
David W. Carstens CARSTENS & CAHOON, LLPPO BOX 802334DALLAS, TX 75380-2334UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | ICE CREAM, DESSERTS CONTAINING ICE CREAM, MILKSHAKES AND ICE CREAM SODAS FOR CONSUMPTION ON OR OFF THE PREMISES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 22, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by G.D. RITZY'S, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RITZY'S INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by G.D. RITZY'S, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by G.D.R. FRANCHISEE ASSOCIATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by G.D. RITZY'S, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named G.D. RITZY'S
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 1, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 30, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 12, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |