USPTO serial 73382733
ENTERPRISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARSH, SHARON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENTERPRISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | BANKING SERVICES; LOAN FINANCING SERVICES; AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, FINANCIAL CONSULTATION, AND FINAANCIAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES. | ABANDONED | Jun 22, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1987 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 24, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 1983 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 23, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |