USPTO serial 73382738
EXPRESSBANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 20, 1990
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EXPRESSBANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ST. JOSEPH, MO
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
ST. JOSEPH, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD E. BACKUS
RICHARD E BACKUS FLEHR HOHBACH TEST ALBRITTON & HERBERTFOUR EMBARCADERO CTRSTE 3400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | AUTOMATIC TELLER BANKING SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 5, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 1996 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 21, 1992 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 23, 1991 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Nov 26, 1991 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 6, 1991 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1991 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 1990 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 1990 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 21, 1989 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |