USPTO serial 73382745
N
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with N?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald W. Margolis
DONALD W MARGOLIS738 PEARL STDENVER, CO 80203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical and Electronic Devices, Components and Systems Comprising: Power Converters; Electric Protection Systems-Namely, Protector Relays for Use in Protecting Electric Equipment from Power Surges; Data Aquisition Systems Comprising Data Sensors, Data Input Contacts, Data Recorders and Data Analyzers; Acceleration Monitors, Acceleration Recorders, G-Force Monitors, G-Force Recorders, Circuit Controllers, Transformers, Rectifiers and Relays | ABANDONED | Jul 8, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 29, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 1989 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 1988 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 1987 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 1986 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 1984 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 1984 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 1984 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 1984 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |