USPTO serial 73388451
MISCELLANEOUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MISCELLANEOUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN D. POFFENBERGER
JOHN D POFFENBERGER CINCINNATIWOOD, HERRON & EVANS2700 CAREW TWR, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | THE SERVICES MARK WAS FIRST USED IN CONNECTION WITH THE SERVICES IN INTERNATIONAL CLASS 36 ON FEBRUARY 1, 1962, WAS FIRST USED IN INTERSTATE COMMERCE ON FEBRUARY 1, 1962, AND IS NOW IN USE IN SUCH COMMERCE; THE SERVICE MARK WAS FIRST USED IN INTERNATIONAL CLASS 42 ON FEBRUARY 1,1962, WAS FIRST USED IN INTERSTATE COMMERCE ON FEBRUARY 1, 1962, AND IS NOW IN USE IN SUCH COMMERCE UNDERWRITING PROPERTY, CASUALTY, LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE; REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT SERVICES | ABANDONED | Feb 1, 1962 |
| 042 | LEASING OF CAPITAL EQUIPMENT TO BUSINESSAND INDUSTRY | ABANDONED | Feb 1, 1962 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |