USPTO serial 73388773
HYPAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WENDEL, HELEN R.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HYPAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIDNEY B. RING
SIDNEY B RING369 MARSHALL AVEST LOUIS, MO 63119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT SOLID HYDROCARBON POLYMERS USED AS PROCESSING AIDS FOR PLASTICS | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 1986 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 5, 1986 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 28, 1986 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 4, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 1985 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |