Drawing for HUMANAGEMENT

USPTO serial 73389246

HUMANAGEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HUMANAGEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, DETERMINING THE MANAGEMENT NEEDS OF CLIENTS BY MEANS OF ANALYSIS OF DATA GENERATED BY INTERVIEWING OF EMPLOYEES AND CUSTOMERS AND CONDUCTING ON-SITE INSPECTIONS OF CLIENT FACILITIESABANDONED—
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, DEVELOPING AND CONDUCTING CUSTOMIZED TRAINING PROGRAMS FOR BUSINESS MANAGERSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 1986ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 2, 1986OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 21, 1986OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 18, 1985OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 6, 1985PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 1985NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 13, 1985CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 29, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 10, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 1984ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 8, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 1984CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 19, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 1984CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 14, 1984CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 27, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance