USPTO serial 73389473
WE HAVE 'EM ALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 23, 1984
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WE HAVE 'EM ALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Michigan City, IN
Michigan City, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Esther O. Kegan
ESTHER O KEGAN KEGAN, KEGAN & BERKMANSTE 132079 W MONROE STCHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Retail Clothing Store Services-Namely, Wearing Apparel | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 18, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 1991 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 23, 1984 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 15, 1984 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 1984 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 1, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1983 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |