USPTO serial 73391880
SOFTWAIRE CENTRE INTERNATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARSH, SHARON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOFTWAIRE CENTRE INTERNATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. Robert Spensley
SPENSLEY, HORN, JUBAS & LUBITZ1880 CENTURY PARK E STE 500LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Softwaire Centres International
- Other trademarks owned by Softwaire Centres International
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SOFTWAIRE CENTRE INTERNATIONAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 1988 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 25, 1988 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 1988 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 1984 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 1984 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 1984 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1984 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1984 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 6, 1983 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |