Drawing for AQUACELL

USPTO serial 73392045

AQUACELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AQUACELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen R. Doody

STEPHEN R DOODY2500 PAN AMERICAN LIFE CTR601 POYDRAS STNEW ORLEANS, LA 70130

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water Filters and Water Purifying Units for Use in Purifying Water for Residential, Commercial and Industrial UsesABANDONEDApr 16, 1973

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 1985ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 6, 1985OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 29, 1985OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 21, 1984OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 27, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 22, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 11, 1983CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 8, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance