USPTO serial 73398072
INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH PRODUCTS, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH PRODUCTS, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AUGUST E. ROEHRIG, JR.
AUGUST E ROEHRIG JR CHICAGO150 N WACKER DR, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SUBMINIATURE ELECTRO-ACOUSTIC CONVERTERS FOR CONVERTING ELECTRICAL SIGNALS TO ACOUSTIC SIGNALS AND ACOUSTIC SIGNALS TO ELECTRICAL SIGNALS; AUTOMATIC MICROPHONE MIXERS, DIGITAL DELAYS AND MICROPHONES FOR IMPROVING SOUND REINFORCING QUALITY AND MICROPHONE MIXERS | ABANDONED | May 20, 1954 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 22, 1986 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 21, 1986 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 15, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 27, 1985 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |