USPTO serial 73400314
THE WHALE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE WHALE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PADSTOW, 2211, N.S.W., AU
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES AND MACHINE TOOLS; MOTORS; MACHINE COUPLINGS AND BELTING; LAR GE SIZE AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS; ROLLERS, ABSORBENT ROLLERS AND SQUEEZ E ROLLERS FOR USE ON PLAYING FIELDS, RACE TRACKS, AND SPORTS GROUNDS; VEHICLES; APPARATUS FOR LOCOMOTION BY LAND | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1987 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 1984 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 23, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |