USPTO serial 73400594
CEMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CEMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | HIGH PURITY ELECTRONIC METALS, METAL ALLOYS AND INTERMETALLICS. | ABANDONED | Mar 25, 1982 |
| 009 | AND BRAISING ALLOY PREFORMS; DIE ATTACH PREFORMS; LIDS AND LID SEAL PREFORMS; SOFT SOLDER PREFORMS; HEAT SINKS; BONDING WIRES; BONDING RIBBONS; VACUUM DEPOSITS;EVAPORATION SUPERCHARGES; EVAPORATION WIRES; SPUTTERING TARGETS; DOPING PREFORMS; COMPOUND SEMICONDUCTORS OF CADMIUM MERCURY TELLURIDE N OR P TYPE SINGLE CRYSTAL WAFERS, CADMIUM TELLURIDE SINGLE CRYSTAL WAFERS AND BARS, GALLIUM ANTIMONIDE SINGLE CRYSTAL WAFERS AND POLYCRYSTALLINESLICES AND INGOTS, GALLIUM ARSENIDE SEMI-INSULATING SINGLE CRYSTAL WAFERS, INDIUM ANTIMONIDE N OR P TYPE, SINGLE CRYSTALWAFERS AND INDIUM ARSENIDE N TYPE, AND SINGLE CRYSTAL WAFERS. | ABANDONED | Mar 25, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |