USPTO serial 73406216
ORTEGA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 25, 1985
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ORTEGA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LAKEWOOD, CA
PENTAIR WATER POOL AND SPA, INC.
MOORPARK, CA
HYDROTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
DECATUR, GA
LAKEWOOD, CA
LAKEWOOD, CA
LAKEWOOD, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas P. Schiller
THOMAS P SCHILLER PEARNE & GORDON LLP1801 E 9TH ST STE 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | WATER FLOW CONTROL VALVES FOR USE IN INDUSTRIES AND APPLICATIONS WHERE CONTROL OF HIGH VOLUME FLOW OF WATER IS NEEDED | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 4, 1972 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PUREX POOL PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PENTAIR WATER POOL AND SPA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HYDROTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by PUREX POOL PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PUREX INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PUREX POOL PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named ORTEGA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 1991 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 21, 1991 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1985 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 16, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 1984 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 1984 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 1984 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 10, 1984 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 1984 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |