USPTO serial 73409672
HIGH TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHN, DEBBIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HIGH TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KINNEY, LANGE, BRADDOCK, WETMAN
KINNEY, LANGE, BRADDOCK, WESTMAN & FAIRBAIRN, P.A.FRIED, VIDAS, STEFFEY &625 FOURTH AVE S STE 1500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING AND ACCESSORIES FOR MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN, EXCLUDING SHOES, NAMELY, JACKETS, COATS, BLOUSES, SHIRTS, PANTS, SHORTS, SWEATERS, SKI PANTS, SKI BIB, HATCAPS, GLOVES, MITTENS, SOCKS, UNDERWEAR, VESTS, SCARVES, BELTS AND TIES | ABANDONED | Dec 16, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 1985 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |