Drawing for SAPORITO

USPTO serial 73410552

SAPORITO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PRICE, JERRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAPORITO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FRED S. LOCKWOOD

FRED S LOCKWOOD LOCKWOOD, ALEX, FITZGIBBON & CUMMINGSTHREE FIRST NATIONAL PLZ STE 1515CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029DRY SAUSAGEABANDONEDMar 15, 1982

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 1986ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 3, 1986EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 4, 1985EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Apr 23, 1985CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Mar 21, 1985EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 18, 1985PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 11, 1985ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 24, 1985PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jul 3, 1984CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 3, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance