USPTO serial 73411018
PUBLIC WAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PUBLIC WAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT A. SPECHT
SCOTT A SPECHT SCOGGINS, IVY, GOODMAN AND WEISS225 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 1700ATLANTA, GA 30303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | "PUBLIC WAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM" REFERS TO A COMPUTER SOFTWARE SYSTEM WHICH IS MARKETED, INSTALLED AND SUPPORTED BY MENTIS CORPORATION. THE SYSTEM IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF A WIDE RANGE OF WAREHOUSE AND DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS. THE SYSTEM PROVIDES, AMONG OTHER THINGS, FOR THE ENTRY AND PRINTING OF DELIVERY AND RECEIVING DOCUMENTS, AUTOMATIC MONTH-END REPORTING AND BILLING BY ACCOUNT WITH AUTOMATIC INVENTORY CONTROL | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 1984 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |